ABSTRACT
Intro: The unavailability of specific treatment for COVID-19 prompted the empirical use of remdesivir, a viral RNA polymerase inhibitor. Since evidences present conflicting results, this study aims to determine the clinical effectiveness and adverse events of adjunctive remdesivir administration vs standard of care (non-remdesivir) in COVID-19 adult patients in a tertiary hospital in Baguio City, Philippines. Method(s): We performed a single-center, retrospective study of severe to critical COVID-19 patients admitted from September 2020 to September 2021. Stratified random sampling was employed and data collection was through chart review. Analysis was done with R Statistical Software version 4, utilizing paired T-test and McNemar test, with p-value of <0.05 considered as significant. Finding(s): A total of 318 patients were reviewed and classified into the remdesivir (n=159) and standard of care (non-remdesivir) (n=159) groups. Baseline characteristics were comparable except for co-morbidities (p<0.05). There were no noted significant differences between both groups in terms of morality (p=0.885) and reduction in chest radiograph infiltrates (p=0.182). However, the average number of days to clinical improvement (7 days vs 12 days) and recovery (16 days vs 21 days) were statistically lesser in the remdesivir group (p=0.00). Also, those who experienced diarrhea (p=0.33) and transaminitis (p=0.003) were significantly higher in those given remdesivir. Conclusion(s): There was no significant difference in terms of mortality in those given remdesivir vs standard of care alone. Nevertheless, remdesivir administration is associated with significantly faster time to clinical improvement and recovery. The drug is thought to facilitate faster lung viral load clearance and improved pulmonary function through inhibition of RNA polymerase. Though not potentially life-threatening, the drug may cause diarrhea and elevation in transaminases.Copyright © 2023